Benjamin Sawyer, Jr. v. W. Lane Crocker, Jr. Robert Schaefer Paul v. King, Jr.

60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24909, 1995 WL 386859
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1995
Docket94-7101
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 824 (Benjamin Sawyer, Jr. v. W. Lane Crocker, Jr. Robert Schaefer Paul v. King, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benjamin Sawyer, Jr. v. W. Lane Crocker, Jr. Robert Schaefer Paul v. King, Jr., 60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24909, 1995 WL 386859 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Benjamin SAWYER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. Lane CROCKER, Jr.; Robert Schaefer; Paul V. King, Jr.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7101.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 24, 1995.
Decided June 30, 1995.

Benjamin Sawyer, Jr., appellant pro se.

Before WILKINSON, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Bivens1 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. We amend the district court's order to reflect that this dismissal is without prejudice.2 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2106 (1988).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's decision as modified. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

1

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

2

We express no opinion regarding the relative merit of a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24909, 1995 WL 386859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-sawyer-jr-v-w-lane-crocker-jr-robert-scha-ca4-1995.