Benjamin Laboy v. Keppel Amfels, LLC and Ramon Pizana Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 18, 2018
Docket13-17-00575-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Benjamin Laboy v. Keppel Amfels, LLC and Ramon Pizana Jr. (Benjamin Laboy v. Keppel Amfels, LLC and Ramon Pizana Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benjamin Laboy v. Keppel Amfels, LLC and Ramon Pizana Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00575-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BENJAMIN LABOY, APPELLANT,

V.

KEPPEL AMFELS, LLC AND RAMON PIZANA JR., APPELLEE.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court because the reporter’s record is incomplete. On

April 3, 2018, the reporter’s record was filed by court reporters Randall Simpson and

Sheila Perales. On April 20, 2018, appellant’s counsel notified this Court that the

reporter’s record was not complete because it did not contain a transcript of a hearing held on June 28, 2016. Counsel filed a second request with Simpson to prepare a partial

reporter’s record to include a transcript of the hearing held on June 28, 2016 regarding

the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

On June 11, 2018, Simpson contacted this Court and stated he has searched his

files for the hearing held on June 28, 2016, but does not have anything for this case. He

states that it is possible his machine did not write the data from the hearing. Simpson

cannot provide a transcript of the June 28, 2016 hearing because the file does not exist.

This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly,

this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f)(4), the trial court is

directed to conduct a hearing to determine if: (1) the appellant has timely requested a

reporter's record; (2) without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant

portion of the court reporter's notes and records has been lost or destroyed or - if the

proceedings were electronically recorded - a significant portion of the recording has been

lost or destroyed or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the

reporter's record, or the lost and destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution;

and (4) the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced

by agreement of the parties, or the lost or destroyed exhibit cannot be replaced either by

agreement of the parties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately

duplicate with reasonable certainty the original exhibit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).

The trial court is directed to forward the record of the proceedings, including any

2 orders and findings, to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to

notify this Court within such period indicating a date by which the trial court can comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 18th day of June, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Benjamin Laboy v. Keppel Amfels, LLC and Ramon Pizana Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-laboy-v-keppel-amfels-llc-and-ramon-pizana-jr-texapp-2018.