Benjamin Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benjamin Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.

74 A.D.2d 861, 426 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 861 (Benjamin Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benjamin Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc., 74 A.D.2d 861, 426 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an agreement to transfer stock, (1) defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 14, 1979, as denied their motion for summary judgment, and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term properly denied both the motion and the cross motion for summary judgment, since it appears that pretrial discovery might reveal the existence of facts essential to the positions of the respective parties (see CPLR 3212, subd [f]). Titone, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an agreement to transfer stock, (1) defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 14, 1979, as denied their motion for summary judgment, and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term properly denied both the motion and the cross motion for summary judgment, since it appears that pretrial discovery might reveal the existence of facts essential to the positions of the respective parties (see CPLR 3212, subd [f]). Titone, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 861, 426 N.Y.S.2d 54, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benjamin-center-v-hampton-affiliates-inc-nyappdiv-1980.