Benj. Wolf Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Benj. Wolf Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 230

United States Customs Court·Decided August 11, 1955·No. No. 59261; protests 255745-K and 256427-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[231]*231Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[231]*231Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 6, 1951, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1210, as modified by T. D. 51802; and (2) the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after June 6, 1951, at 32)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 52739.

Benj. Wolf Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 230 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 230 (Benj. Wolf Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related