Benito v. State
179 S.W. 1198, 1915 WL 103
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of gaming, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10. Neither a statement of facts nor any bills of exception accompany the record. The information charges the offense of which appellant was convicted. No ground is stated in the motion for a new trial we can review in the absence of the testimony. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benito v. State, 179 S.W. 1198, 1915 WL 103 (Tex. 1915).
179 S.W. 1198 (Benito v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.