Benito, Rigoberto v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2012·No. 05-12-00375-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 1l). , 2012

In The Court of cappeatti jfiftb Miotritt of Texaci at Maims No. 05-12-00375-CR

IUGOBERTO BENITO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-81659-09

ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On October 22, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why

appellant's brief had not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to

pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel; (3)

counsel explained that the delay in filing appellant's brief was due to her workload and some

personal issues; and (4) appellant's brief can be filed by November 19, 2012.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by NOVEMBER 19, 2012.

444,c4.40-0-■ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benito, Rigoberto v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Benito, Rigoberto v. State (Benito, Rigoberto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.