Benito Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Virginia
This text of Benito Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Benito Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6295
BENITO MIRANDA HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00128-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benito Miranda Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Benito Miranda Hernandez appeals the district court’s
order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hernandez v. Virginia, No. 1:13-cv-00128-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. filed
Feb. 11; entered Feb. 12, 2013). See generally Bereano v.
United States, 706 F.3d 568 (4th Cir. 2013) (identifying
parameters of coram nobis relief). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Benito Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benito-hernandez-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-ca4-2013.