Benito Castro v. United States

531 U.S. 1063, 148 L. Ed. 2d 654, 121 S. Ct. 751, 69 U.S.L.W. 3455, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 194, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 249, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 110
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 2001·No. No. 00-6427·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U. S. 466 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benito Castro v. United States, 531 U.S. 1063, 148 L. Ed. 2d 654, 121 S. Ct. 751, 69 U.S.L.W. 3455, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 194, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 249, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 110 (2001).

531 U.S. 1063 (Benito Castro v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spears v. State
725 N.W.2d 696 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)
Hughes v. State
901 So. 2d 837 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Daniel Siebert v. Donal Campbell
334 F.3d 1018 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Castro
35 F. App'x 553 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Hindenach v. State
807 So. 2d 739 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
McCloud v. State
803 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
United States v. Barry Leon Ardley
273 F.3d 991 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Gilson v. State
795 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Grant v. State
783 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
United States v. Ardley
242 F.3d 989 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)