Benitez v. Wilmington Savings

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Benitez v. Wilmington Savings

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 2017

Docket5D16-3969

StatusPublished

This text of Benitez v. Wilmington Savings (Benitez v. Wilmington Savings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benitez v. Wilmington Savings, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MARISOL CONTRERAS BENITEZ,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3969

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE PRIMESTAR AR-H FUND I TRUST,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Sandra E. Champ, Judge.

Eric O. Husby, Tampa, for Appellant.

Ezra Scrivanich, of Scrivanich Hayes, Plantation, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

ON REHEARING

We grant rehearing in this case and withdraw the previously-issued opinion. We

substitute the following in its stead. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to Archer v. U.S.

Bank National Ass’n, 220 So. 3d 477, 478-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

DISMISSED.

SAWAYA, WALLIS, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI