Benitez v. Hubbard Construction Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Benitez v. Hubbard Construction Co.

888 So. 2d 670, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17289, 2004 WL 2579646

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2004·No. No. 1D04-226·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of a workers’ compensation claim denying Claimant’s requested Otto Bock C-Leg to replace a virtually useless older prosthesis, which caused Claimant pain and difficulty ambulating, we hold that the JCC erred in denying the [671]*671requested Otto Bock C-Leg prosthesis and reverse as to that issue. As to all other issues raised, we affirm.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of a workers’ compensation claim denying Claimant’s requested Otto Bock C-Leg to replace a virtually useless older prosthesis, which caused Claimant pain and difficulty ambulating, we hold that the JCC erred in denying the [671]*671requested Otto Bock C-Leg prosthesis and reverse as to that issue. As to all other issues raised, we affirm.

BOOTH, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Benitez v. Hubbard Construction Co., 888 So. 2d 670, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17289, 2004 WL 2579646 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

888 So. 2d 670 (Benitez v. Hubbard Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.