Benitez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benitez v. City of New York

2 A.D.3d 285, 769 N.Y.S.2d 258, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13585

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 285 (Benitez v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benitez v. City of New York, 2 A.D.3d 285, 769 N.Y.S.2d 258, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered on or about November 27, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion to restore his action to the pretrial calendar, inter alia, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs personal injury action was dismissed by order of Justice Braun in March 1998, on the erroneous impression that the action had been marked off the calendar in June 1994 and abandoned, when in fact it had been restored to the calendar by order of Justice Solomon in September 1997. The remedy for that error was a timely motion for reargument (CPLR 2221), a timely appeal (CPLR 5513), or a timely motion to be relieved of default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). Plaintiff did none of these. Justice Braun’s dismissal order has become final. Plaintiff has failed to present valid grounds for reviving this action at this late date. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered on or about November 27, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion to restore his action to the pretrial calendar, inter alia, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs personal injury action was dismissed by order of Justice Braun in March 1998, on the erroneous impression that the action had been marked off the calendar in June 1994 and abandoned, when in fact it had been restored to the calendar by order of Justice Solomon in September 1997. The remedy for that error was a timely motion for reargument (CPLR 2221), a timely appeal (CPLR 5513), or a timely motion to be relieved of default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). Plaintiff did none of these. Justice Braun’s dismissal order has become final. Plaintiff has failed to present valid grounds for reviving this action at this late date. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 285, 769 N.Y.S.2d 258, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benitez-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack