Benitez v. Biltmore Systems, Inc.

496 So. 2d 189, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 1986
DocketNo. 86-1768
StatusPublished

This text of 496 So. 2d 189 (Benitez v. Biltmore Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benitez v. Biltmore Systems, Inc., 496 So. 2d 189, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The respondent concedes that its argument made before the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity was never made in the county court, and, therefore, petitioner never had an opportunity to brief or explicate her position.

[190]*190Based upon that concession, we vacate the order of the circuit court affirming the judgment of the county court and remand to the circuit court with directions to remand to the county court for further proceedings in light of section 627.736, Florida Statutes (1985).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 So. 2d 189, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2129, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benitez-v-biltmore-systems-inc-fladistctapp-1986.