Benison v. Ross
This text of 771 F.3d 331 (Benison v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the ease. The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
[332]*332Therefore, the petition is denied. Judge Alarcon would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
771 F.3d 331, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21560, 2014 WL 6461979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benison-v-ross-ca6-2014.