Benigno Hernandez-Cisneros v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III
This text of 678 F. App'x 464 (Benigno Hernandez-Cisneros v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mexican citizen Benigno Hernandez-Cisneros petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Previously, an immigration judge (IJ) had granted Hernandez-Cisneros cancellation of removal on discretionary hardship grounds, and the BIA had issued an order vacating the IJ’s decision and remanding solely for entry of an order of removal. Hernandez-Cisneros sought to appeal the resulting order of removal. The BIA treated the appeal as a motion seeking reconsideration of its prior order, and found that Hernandez-Cisneros had not identified errors of fact or law establishing a basis to disturb its prior decision. 2 After careful consideration, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Cisneros’s reconsideration request. See Martinez v. Lynch, 785 F.3d 1262, 1264-65 (8th Cir. 2015). The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The BIA’s determination that Hernandez-Cisneros failed to submit the requisite new and material evidence for a motion to reopen is not before us in this petition for review. See Jenkins v. Winter, 540 F.3d 742, 751 (8th Cir. 2008) (issues not raised in opening brief are deemed waived).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 F. App'x 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benigno-hernandez-cisneros-v-jefferson-b-sessions-iii-ca8-2017.