Bengston v. PIONEER PACKAGING & PRINTING

717 N.W.2d 895, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 502, 2006 WL 2075701
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 19, 2006·No. A06-725·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 14, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

*896 BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bengston v. PIONEER PACKAGING & PRINTING, 717 N.W.2d 895, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 502, 2006 WL 2075701 (Mich. 2006).

717 N.W.2d 895 (Bengston v. PIONEER PACKAGING & PRINTING) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Van Liew
717 N.W.2d 895 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2006)