Bengis v. Moss
This text of Bengis v. Moss (Bengis v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1049
JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RICHARD MOSS, ESQ. and KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP,
Defendants-Appellees.
Panagiota Betty Tufariello, Intellectulaw, The Law Offices of P.B. Tufariello, P.C., of Mount Sinai, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
Jeffrey W. Davis, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Matthew B. Moses. Of counsel was Thomas H. Moreland.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Judge Jed S. Rakoff NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1049
RICHARD MOSS, ESQ. and KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-4237
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED October 9, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bengis v. Moss, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bengis-v-moss-cafc-2009.