Bengels v. Woods
This text of 14 A.D.2d 517 (Bengels v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The papers demonstrate no genuine or bona fide claim on the part of plaintiff. Opposed to the documentary proof, plaintiff presents merely an ingenious, and palpably unsupported, device to transform a transaction in which he acted as a principal — and from which he had to recede — into a claim for brokerage commissions. Plaintiff does not produce any prima facie support for ignoring the contract of sale which he signed as a principal, and which expressly disclaimed the intervention of any broker in procuring the sale. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 517, 217 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bengels-v-woods-nyappdiv-1961.