Benford v. Daniels

20 Ala. 445
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ala. 445 (Benford v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benford v. Daniels, 20 Ala. 445 (Ala. 1852).

Opinion

CHILTON, J.

A motion was made in the Chancery Court in this cause to dismiss the bill for want of equity, and the Chancellor overruled the motion, and held that the bill contained equity. An appeal was taken from his decision to this court, and the counsel agree here to raise no objection to the jurisdiction of this court, but desire our opinion upon the merits of the bill.

[446]*446It is manifest tbat there has been no final decree in this cause. It is in tbe Chancery Court in the same condition in which it was before the motion was made, and it follows that this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal, and having no jurisdiction, it is clear that we are not warranted in taking jurisdiction by consent of the counsel. An appeal lies from an interlocutory order dissolving an injunction by statute, but no statute, and no rule of practice, authorizes us to take jurisdiction of such an appeal as this.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ala. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benford-v-daniels-ala-1852.