Benevides v. Reese

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Benevides v. Reese

192 So. 3d 1246, 2016 WL 3125687, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8470

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 2016

Docket5D15-4217

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 1246 (Benevides v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benevides v. Reese, 192 So. 3d 1246, 2016 WL 3125687, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8470 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Benevides, who is currently in federal custody, purports to appeal matters related to the care and custody of his child. Yet he has not’provided this Court with the record ón appeal, a ‘Copy of the final judgment that he appeals, or any transcript of the trial for our review. The absence of these documents precludes a meaningful review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d) (requiring a copy of the order under review be attached to the notice of appeal); Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(e) (establishing duty of appellant to ensure record is prepared and transmitted); Smith v. Orhama, Inc., 907 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming based on appellants’ failure to submit a transcript for meaningful review). , ..

AFFIRMED..

COHEN, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pedro Benevides, who is currently in federal custody, purports to appeal matters related to the care and custody of his child. Yet he has not’provided this Court with the record ón appeal, a ‘Copy of the final judgment that he appeals, or any transcript of the trial for our review. The absence of these documents precludes a meaningful review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d) (requiring a copy of the order under review be attached to the notice of appeal); Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(e) (establishing duty of appellant to ensure record is prepared and transmitted); Smith v. Orhama, Inc., 907 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming based on appellants’ failure to submit a transcript for meaningful review). , ..

AFFIRMED..

COHEN, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 3d 1246, 2016 WL 3125687, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benevides-v-reese-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack