Benefield v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Benefield v. State

165 So. 897, 123 Fla. 1, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 924

DecidedFebruary 20, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 897 (Benefield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benefield v. State, 165 So. 897, 123 Fla. 1, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 924 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review j’udgment of conviction of the offense of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony, to-wit, with the intent to commit grand larceny.

The only question presented for our determination is whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict and as the record discloses ample substantial evidence to support the verdict and j'udgment, the j'udgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. *2 Whitfield, C. J., and Davis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI