Benefield v. Benefield

Alabama Court of Appeals

Benefield v. Benefield

150 So. 711, 25 Ala. App. 568, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 186

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 7, 1933

Docket6 Div. 399.

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 711 (Benefield v. Benefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benefield v. Benefield, 150 So. 711, 25 Ala. App. 568, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 186 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Justice.

The judgment was against Dave Benefield, Mack Gossett, and John Hanna. The appeal is by Dave Benefield alone.

No notice or summons as provided jm section 6143 of the Code was issued and executed, so far as the record shows, as regards either Mack Gossett or John Hanna.

Under such circumstances it is necessary for us to dismiss the appeal. Hagood et al. v. Cleckler, 221 Ala. 379, 129 So. 2; Sherrod v. McGruder et al., 209 Ala. 260, 96 So. 78; Code 1923, § 7318.

And it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI