Benefield v. Benefield
150 So. 711, 25 Ala. App. 568, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 186
Opinion
The judgment was against Dave Benefield, Mack Gossett, and John Hanna. The appeal is by Dave Benefield alone.
No notice or summons as provided jm section 6143 of the Code was issued and executed, so far as the record shows, as regards either Mack Gossett or John Hanna.
Under such circumstances it is necessary for us to dismiss the appeal. Hagood et al. v. Cleckler, 221 Ala. 379, 129 So. 2; Sherrod v. McGruder et al., 209 Ala. 260, 96 So. 78; Code 1923, § 7318.
And it is so ordered.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benefield v. Benefield, 150 So. 711, 25 Ala. App. 568, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 186 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
150 So. 711 (Benefield v. Benefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sherrod v. McGruder
96 So. 78 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Hagood v. Cleckler
129 So. 2 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)