Beneficial National Life Co v. Small

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beneficial National Life Co v. Small

184 A.D.2d 241, 586 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7695

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 A.D.2d 241 (Beneficial National Life Co v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beneficial National Life Co v. Small, 184 A.D.2d 241, 586 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered December 1, 1991, which, inter alia, granted defendants Small and Raichlin’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action pleaded in plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to state any independent theory of liability as against the defendant insurance agents, except those sounding in indemnity or contribution. Since the plaintiff insurer prevailed in the main action, no subsequent claim of indem[242]*242nity and/or contribution may be asserted (cf., Ulysse v Nelsk Taxi, 135 AD2d 528, lv denied 73 NY2d 702; compare, Cohen Agency v Perlman Agency, 51 NY2d 358). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered December 1, 1991, which, inter alia, granted defendants Small and Raichlin’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action pleaded in plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to state any independent theory of liability as against the defendant insurance agents, except those sounding in indemnity or contribution. Since the plaintiff insurer prevailed in the main action, no subsequent claim of indem[242]*242nity and/or contribution may be asserted (cf., Ulysse v Nelsk Taxi, 135 AD2d 528, lv denied 73 NY2d 702; compare, Cohen Agency v Perlman Agency, 51 NY2d 358). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 241, 586 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beneficial-national-life-co-v-small-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack