Beneficial Industrial Loan Corporation v. Handy

92 F.2d 74, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 219, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4491
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 11, 1937·No. 6353·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the court below, taxpayer, appellant, brought suit against the Revenue Collector to recover income taxes illegally, as contended, collected from it. By stipulation, jury was waived and the case tried by the judge, who found in favor of the collector. Thereupon taxpayer took this appeal. Reference to the opinion of the court, reported in (D.C.) 16 F.Supp. 110, avoids a present repetition of the facts and circumstances of the case.

The sole question involved is whether certain sums expended by the taxpayer for professional services rendered in the general examination and review of operations of certain companies taken over in a reorganization effective December 31, 1929, is deductible from gross income when paid either as an ordinary and necessary business expense incurred during the taxable year in carrying on its trade or business or as a loss sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.

After hearing and consideration, we are of opinion the court committed no error and that on its own reasoning and the cases of Simmons Co. v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 33 F.(2d) 75, and Corning Glass Works v. Lucas, 59 App.D.C. 168, 37 F.(2d) 798, 68 A.L.R. 736, its judgment should be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beneficial Industrial Loan Corporation v. Handy, 92 F.2d 74, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 219, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4491 (3d Cir. 1937).

92 F.2d 74 (Beneficial Industrial Loan Corporation v. Handy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Loan Co. v. Handy
92 F.2d 74 (Third Circuit, 1937)