Benedix v. Benedix
This text of 226 A.D. 815 (Benedix v. Benedix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned court at Special Term erred in reducing the alimony in the absence of a proper application to the court. (Barrett v. Barrett, 221 App. Div. 710; Thompson v. Thompson, 197 id. 228.) The order, is therefore, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for action upon the motion to punish for contempt. The decision, however, is without prejudice to defendant to move for a reduction of alimony. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedix-v-benedix-nyappdiv-1929.