Benedict's Estate

70 Pa. Super. 51, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 166
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 10, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 10·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

While it is true that we must search for the intent of the testator only within the four corners of his will when we come to consider it and interpret its meaning, we must do so in the light of all the circumstances by which he was surrounded when he made it, and by which he was probably influenced: Hermann’s Est., 220 Pa. 52. Where the words of the will are free from ambiguity and the intention is plainly manifest through the use of apt words, the courts will not attempt to reform the testator’s disposition of his property by substituting their ideas for his in a distribution of his estate. The opinion of the court below satisfies us of the correctness of its conclusion in confirming the account and the statement of distribution made in the adjudication.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict's Estate, 70 Pa. Super. 51, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 166 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

70 Pa. Super. 51 (Benedict's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vandergrift Estate
177 A.2d 432 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Hope Estate
16 Pa. D. & C.2d 410 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1959)
Straus Estate
40 A.2d 402 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)
Bomberger Estate
32 A.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Schmalzried's Estate
25 Pa. D. & C. 554 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1936)