Benedicto v. Porto Rican American Tobacco Co. of Porto Rico

263 U.S. 688, 44 S. Ct. 228, 68 L. Ed. 507, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2844
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 14, 1924·No. No. 153·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Reversed with [689]*689the direction to dismiss upon the authority of: (1) Irwin v. Wright, 258 U. S. 219, 222; Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Wendell, 261 U. S. 1, 5; (2) United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475; Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Compañia General, 249 U. S. 425, 426-427; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216, 217-218.

Mr, Grant T. Trent, with whom Mr. F. Granville Munson was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. H. Lewis Brown, with whom Mr. Branch P. Kerfoot and Mr. A. PL. Burroughs were on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedicto v. Porto Rican American Tobacco Co. of Porto Rico, 263 U.S. 688, 44 S. Ct. 228, 68 L. Ed. 507, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2844 (1924).

263 U.S. 688 (Benedicto v. Porto Rican American Tobacco Co. of Porto Rico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irwin v. Wright
258 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell
261 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Brownlow v. Schwartz
261 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1923)