Benedict v. Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan

77 A.D.3d 872, 909 N.Y.S.2d 390
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 26, 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated December 22, 2008.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as academic, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, in light of our determination in Benedict v Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan (77 AD3d 870 [2010] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict v. Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan, 77 A.D.3d 872, 909 N.Y.S.2d 390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 872 (Benedict v. Whitman Breed Abbott & Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benedict v. Abbott
110 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)