Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc.

665 F.3d 1263

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 2011

Docket2011-1131

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 665 F.3d 1263 (Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc., 665 F.3d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit WARD E. BENEDICT, Appellozmf, V. SUPER BAKERY, INCORPORATED, Appellee. 20 1 1 - 1 1 3 1 (Cance11ation No. 92047859) Appea1 from the United StateS Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Tria1 and Appea1 Board. ON MOTION ORDER The court treats Ward E. Benedict’s informal brief as a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. Super Bakery, Incorp0rated oppoSes. Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted

BENEDICT V. SUPER BAKERY 2 (2) Super Bakery should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 0 7 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly _ cc: Ward E. Benedict David G. Oberdick, Esq. s20 Clerk != 99 .?=.‘e HC s§11 3 _,=.:=.'lF'. 235 EALS FU RCUlT HAR 0 7 2011 ` 1AnmonaALv cum

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit WARD E. BENEDICT, Appellozmf, V. SUPER BAKERY, INCORPORATED, Appellee. 20 1 1 - 1 1 3 1 (Cance11ation No. 92047859) Appea1 from the United StateS Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Tria1 and Appea1 Board. ON MOTION ORDER The court treats Ward E. Benedict’s informal brief as a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. Super Bakery, Incorp0rated oppoSes. Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted

BENEDICT V. SUPER BAKERY 2 (2) Super Bakery should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 0 7 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly _ cc: Ward E. Benedict David G. Oberdick, Esq. s20 Clerk != 99 .?=.‘e HC s§11 3 _,=.:=.'lF'. 235 EALS FU RCUlT HAR 0 7 2011 ` 1AnmonaALv cum

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

665 F.3d 1263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-super-bakery-inc-cafc-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack