Benedict v. Schurman
184 A.D. 886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1918
StatusPublished
This text of 184 A.D. 886 (Benedict v. Schurman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Benedict v. Schurman, 184 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to renew motion for examination of defendant before trial, on Bamberger v. Cooke (181 App. Div. 805). Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Page and Shearn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bamberger v. Cooke
181 A.D. 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
184 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-schurman-nyappdiv-1918.