Benedict v. Houghton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benedict v. Houghton

90 N.Y.S. 1088

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1088 (Benedict v. Houghton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benedict v. Houghton, 90 N.Y.S. 1088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Held, that the principal transactions involved in the action were the dealings between the appellants Dugglebiy and Houghton and the alleged fraudulent .acceptance and disposition of the bond and! mortgage by the latter; that the accounting5 asked for is merely incidental to the main issue's, and a reference at present does not seem proper or necessary. \

MCLENNAN, P. j., and Stover, J., dissent,,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. Held, that the principal transactions involved in the action were the dealings between the appellants Dugglebiy and Houghton and the alleged fraudulent .acceptance and disposition of the bond and! mortgage by the latter; that the accounting5 asked for is merely incidental to the main issue's, and a reference at present does not seem proper or necessary. \

MCLENNAN, P. j., and Stover, J., dissent,,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-houghton-nyappdiv-1904.