Benedict v. Hoggin

2 Cal. 385
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 Cal. 385 (Benedict v. Hoggin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benedict v. Hoggin, 2 Cal. 385 (Cal. 1852).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydenfeldt, Justice.

The 135th section of the “act to regulate the settlement of the estates of deceased persons,” provides, that “when a claim is rejected either by an executor, or administrator, or the probate judge, the holder shall bring suit in the proper Court against the executor or administrator within three months after the date of its rejection, if it be then due, or within three months after it becomes due, otherwise the claim shall be forever barred.”

The District Court was asked to charge that such was the law, and the evidence contained in the statement shows that the charge requested was proper and relevant. I can see no reason for its refusal; such is the expressly written law of the land, and obedience to it must be exacted.

Let the judgment be reversed, with costs.

Murray, Chief Justice.—I concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Radar v. Rogers
317 P.2d 17 (California Supreme Court, 1957)
Estate of Wilcox
158 P.2d 32 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cal. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-hoggin-cal-1852.