Benedict v. Bunnell
This text of 7 Cal. 245 (Benedict v. Bunnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.
The defendant executed a note and mortgage to plaintiff. At the date of the note and mortgage, the defendant was a married man, but his wife was not then a resident of this State.
The only question in this case was settled in the case of Cary v. Tice and wife, decided at the last term of this Court. “ The premises never were impressed with the character of a homestead until actual residence upon them hy the family/-’
So much of the judgment of the Court below as is appealed from is reversed, and that Court will enter judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Cal. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-bunnell-cal-1857.