Benedict v. Brownson
1 Kirby 70
Opinion
He is interested and inadmissible, as he has a promise to share the benefit of the recovery, if one is had: Though, if the objection went no further than, that the plaintiff was indebted to him, and had no visible means of payment, excepting by a recovery, it would not exclude him. That point has been long decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benedict v. Brownson, 1 Kirby 70 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).
1 Kirby 70 (Benedict v. Brownson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.