Benedict v. Berger

64 Ill. App. 173, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 868
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 27, 1896·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

An instrument in form of a note, payable to the order of the maker, is not a note until indorsed, ordered paid by the maker, and delivered.

So far as appears, this instrument was not a contract of any kind until after the indorsements were made by Hartman and Mrs. Berger.

Appellees Hartman and Mrs. Berger were record indorsers only. Pike v. Hately, Ill. App., opinion filed February 11, 1896; Blanchford v. Milliken, 35 Ill. 434.

There was no evidence warranting a recovery against them as such.

.The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict v. Berger, 64 Ill. App. 173, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 868 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

64 Ill. App. 173 (Benedict v. Berger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blatchford v. Milliken
35 Ill. 434 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1864)