Benedict v. Beebee

New York Supreme Court

Benedict v. Beebee

11 Johns. 145

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1814

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 11 Johns. 145 (Benedict v. Beebee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benedict v. Beebee, 11 Johns. 145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff having expressly abandoned all claim for damages for a breach of the contract as to the farm, all objections as to the statute of frauds are removed. A promise or undertaking by the defendant to pay the plaintiff for the improvements made by the deienxfant on the land, is not void under the statute. It was so decided by this court in the case of Freer v. Hardenbergh. (5 Johns. Rep. 272.)

The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff having expressly abandoned all claim for damages for a breach of the contract as to the farm, all objections as to the statute of frauds are removed. A promise or undertaking by the defendant to pay the plaintiff for the improvements made by the deienxfant on the land, is not void under the statute. It was so decided by this court in the case of Freer v. Hardenbergh. (5 Johns. Rep. 272.)

The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Johns. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-beebee-nysupct-1814.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack