Benedict v. Andrews, United Traction Company
148 N.E. 738, 240 N.Y. 638, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 869
This text of 148 N.E. 738 (Benedict v. Andrews, United Traction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Benedict v. Andrews, United Traction Company, 148 N.E. 738, 240 N.Y. 638, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 869 (N.Y. 1925).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 N.E. 738, 240 N.Y. 638, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedict-v-andrews-united-traction-company-ny-1925.