Benedetto v. O'Grady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benedetto v. O'Grady

10 A.D.2d 628, 196 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11947

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 10 A.D.2d 628 (Benedetto v. O'Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benedetto v. O'Grady, 10 A.D.2d 628, 196 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from so much of a judgment entered after trial as enjoined appellants from, inter alla, picketing respondent’s place of business, (2) from the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the decision, and (3) from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Respondent brought this action on the ground that the picketing by appellants was for the unlawful labor objective of compelling respondent to sign a contract with appellant union as the representative of respondent’s employees when said union concededly did not represent a majority of such employees. Judgment insofar as appealed from and order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Appeal from findings of fact and conclusions of law dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies therefrom. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [14 Misc 2d 46.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from so much of a judgment entered after trial as enjoined appellants from, inter alla, picketing respondent’s place of business, (2) from the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the decision, and (3) from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Respondent brought this action on the ground that the picketing by appellants was for the unlawful labor objective of compelling respondent to sign a contract with appellant union as the representative of respondent’s employees when said union concededly did not represent a majority of such employees. Judgment insofar as appealed from and order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Appeal from findings of fact and conclusions of law dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies therefrom. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [14 Misc 2d 46.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 628, 196 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benedetto-v-ogrady-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack