Benedetto v. De Lano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benedetto v. De Lano

274 A.D. 887, 82 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3904

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1948·Published

Opinion

In an action by a 'broker against purchasers of real property for damages in the amount of commissions the broker would have received from the seller if the purchasers had not breached their contract with the broker, order of the County Court, Westchester County, denying appellants’ (purchasers’) motion [888] to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, affirmed, with $10' costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Ackman v. Taylor, 296 N. Y. 597.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a 'broker against purchasers of real property for damages in the amount of commissions the broker would have received from the seller if the purchasers had not breached their contract with the broker, order of the County Court, Westchester County, denying appellants’ (purchasers’) motion [888] to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, affirmed, with $10' costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Ackman v. Taylor, 296 N. Y. 597.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Benedetto v. De Lano, 274 A.D. 887, 82 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

274 A.D. 887 (Benedetto v. De Lano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related