Bender v. Wiegand Sports GmbH

• Court: District Court, D. Maryland
• Decided: February 5, 2025
• Docket: 1:23-cv-01511
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARY ANN BENDER, et al., * Plaintiffs, *

v. = CIVIL NO. JKB-23-1511 WIEGAND SPORTS GMBH, et al., * Defendants. = * * * * * * * x * * x * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 110.) Defendants’ opposition was due on January 28, 2025, but they have not filed one. □ The Court issued a Scheduling Order in this case setting, infer alia, a deadline of December 22, 2023 for moving for joinder of additional parties and amendment of pleadings. (ECF No. 47.) The parties have sought—and have been granted—the extension of most deadlines, but they have not sought an extension of the deadline for moving for joinder of additional parties and amendment of pleadings. (See ECF Nos. 62, 96, 106.) Thus, given that the pending Motion was filed on January 14, 2025, the deadline for moving to amend the pleadings has long passed. Therefore, the- Court must assess the pending Motion pursuant to both Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) and 15(a)(2). See Timbers v. Telligent Masonry, LLC, Civ. No. JKB-21-00293, 2022 WL 17541751, at *3 (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2022) (“A motion for leave to amend pleadings filed beyond the deadline set forth in the scheduling order will only be granted if it satisfies both the ‘good cause’ standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) and the standard of Rule 15(a)(2) for allowing amendment of pleadings.”). ]

In the pending Motion, Plaintiffs reference only the Rule 15 standard, not the Rule 16 standard, although they do acknowledge that the amendment deadline has passed. (See ECF No. 110 at 8.) However, Plaintiffs will not be required to correct this oversight because their briefing provides the Court with sufficient detail to allow the Court to conclude they satisfy both relevant standards, and because Defendants have filed no opposition. As this Court has explained: Good cause exists if “deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the party’s diligence.” Cook v. Howard, 484 Fed. App’x 805, 815 (4th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (quotations omitted). Courts consider “whether the moving party acted in good faith, the length of the delay and its effects, and whether the delay will prejudice the non-moving party.” Elat v. Ngoubene, 993 F. Supp. 2d 497, 520 (D. Md. 2014). Timbers, 2022 WL 17541751, at *4. Plaintiffs appear to have acted diligently and in good faith. They seek to amend their complaint to accommodate facts they have learned in discovery, which is ongoing. Under such circumstances, the Court finds that there is good cause. And while the length of the delay would ordinarily lead the Court to deny the Motion, as Plaintiffs point out, there is no reason the filing of this Second Amended Complaint should cause any change to the operative schedule in this case. Further, the Court does not discern any prejudice to Defendants. As Plaintiffs explain, the proposed Second Amended Complaint “contains the exact same legal theories, and the only change made is that it splits the gross negligence, strict liability, and intentional torts claims . . . into separate counts.” and “the Amended Complaint contained broader allegations that the Second Amended Complaint narrows.” (ECF No. 110 at 8-9.) The conclusion that Defendants will suffer no prejudice is bolstered by the fact that Defendants have not filed any opposition to the Motion.!

' The Court recognizes that Defendants have not consented to the filing of a second amended complaint. As Plaintiffs explain in their Motion, they sought Defendants’ consent, but “[u]nfortunately, Defendants’ counsel were not able to respond to the request in the time given.” (ECF No. 110 at 3.) Plaintiffs also explain that, “[s]hould Defendants’ counsel provide their clients’ consent after the filing of this Motion, Plaintiffs agree to file a line to that effect.” (/d.)

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 110) is GRANTED.

DATED this day of February, 2025. BY THE COURT:

□ Cte A. [2A James K. Bredar United States District Judge

The Court has received no such notification. However, the fact remains that Defendants have not opposed the Motion and the Court presumes that, if Defendants believed they would be prejudiced by the filing of the proposed Second Amended Complaint, they would have said so.

eee ah EP □ | cae tea ae Oe tree < a iSO, | ee a ae 2 = % i: : ie the □□ ¢ it Fee Cee Path meee ees . (32. Meh ‘a □ = □ me 5 □□□ og Bl os oF = tte i eis 8 : □ Po □□ □□□ ae oa ef pie ois Eilzeatd wi wk SBSH. - Lay: RESO | Set eet St, 5 rus po ee Sas. = af 2 □ = eel | Stet ag Pa eae Ba at Sarg Neale! re □□ * tx : Oi rasta EN pe a ras re, Cs as mig x my oe □ □ aa Ee a es aly seta RCE Cer Sa Wi Soran etn gieS ee CERES. = cee rb, . Heir etitary es ghtekaeis Sega BRIE tee ate Se ce ae: Pacers gl 2 SS poe ie See i eee ey □ pci ie giede RE Ceeg een Srey eg, Sit rie oie ose Breet. Tk. □□□ toe Pon RUS (ot ee CE ee eee BoP usoih ee ee ee os □ ee □□ Loui: Sigh ee fe Peale WR Tn met eee SA RE □□□ c Poke a q eee Py AP aa GON aT REE Baer sees eee yt EP 72 om. apie ) ELT gf FnadeS Bene □□ re a eee | Sires ee 4 iar Ab ae Sore Penge eee . boty witha $F ee) OL. Pe nae aga ee ra “eas oe ¥ Fes SOSH restigensy See es nite Shee ea AR. SR EL eh ae BR A & 2 | ' of eee et = vary Tage: See iat ce wis wy se Sreted ie | □ □ “Sis: Prtgeres ke □□□ EY a re 4 - = ats ; erase ‘ 2 A a ae es tie Sas Sa 3 □□□ eee a he areoearanag ep Pee me eee ares 5 a ¥ □□□ □□ □□ hee = 4 eT ete anges Se cee tes Se ieee “a mag) = Ny = □□□□□□□□□ □ □□ of SED Sle ee ewe glee yA ag: By pik = sooty □□□□ □□□ = Ste oP et es x EET Set a a ae tier rere sp eee □□□ sha Fe ape! =A Sy AS + =4 : . ap □□ □□□□ = ia oh nae gre Fetal sry aR ene een og , mgs erage □□□ □□□ oi Seis Bate ER, eee, □□□ Ce Spar ct □□ □ Moog Se ee ae ot eile Ee HSS TS ey Sock. whl rok ae Sages yt ee ee ee 5. 3 wut 7 i se PN □□ Se ris! a Le eg eee whet ihr fg - Sess □□□ □ "er Sis pte ial tt ia Pa ot: * OE tte oy aah RE = te Sat 4 2 Sg Se Pe 4g eet see ay: A, = es Si pig □□ aera □□ FRA a ae ie ep en 15 mu TEES ee te i* ‘ 7 ae □□□ □□ Ho (hy Be NR ate any 42 Terere. fog ree, eo : AP Stab Semaiee pe ee 2 2 PB Ae gm ae” fel hem ee □□ , “5 z Rates Pasar » aS. 1 we : tu □ é 4 Cees. a = □ . : hoe co □ = se - □□ ee, Skee | a : 2 : 27 want ers Le Ra a, ti : ag □ : me * a EE 7. □□□ A oa! 5 eee ah : aa Dy Re We we Ae a ge ee den sais ‘ ae = i co gi <=. w eee oe a we = ORME . = hy, ee A EY Mc i) small =o Des fares 2) oe □ = oeen eemN eR See SET ge □□ oe oa ee ~s ad eee ate, Oe eS | See eee. Seta 2 te ee ee fe eee Dapihe = erence ex gsr] a Se a ir □□ 7 = we 34 ste □□ moti AS oth “Ee aE he oye □□□ Ee oe rise Se oetden AE RZ Beas * Ca \ □□□ □□ oe Se = ma ees Fue ue cs - st 7 += = Roth me iy Ea = Pg TA Ge ee Ts □□□ Te : on a a act TS ba 5 aes Un gas i LE EAE Foe 5 . te. tos! os ete + a” wy 3 SERA ees 12 se ce 5 = SS 2 7 fee | ee oe Wa ys > PPS ae : aot 3. neg: +o eee A . □ a ee "=*% * □ «eel eS. shine eh a 7 Bek 4. □□ aes too Mey : | oP are . iti rl te - i nga “ 7 “in “oe + “~~ = = ‘ Mack Pee Se pS en = 3 . “2 oe mt ea “Tas ee : ae Bot 5 □□□ \ : te = "meet: Sp Ie ~e oF 1 = eee ay 3 = a ia rege oe : oe woah: oe” = + eta 27h ee “EE a 5 f oe Tr t ao : ees Ne □ utet = oo ee | □ = a : Wircie cS “= : : ~ - □□ Toe ; : ce vibel unk □□□ gs : Hog : EP a tafe =: 2 a . SSA TSR. iF 7 wo ne ape ; □ □□ é : at eT ee oy SE ae : ; = IP = 7 i pe -t a i) Suet eS ao a es ee x "3 Soe Coe ag: « Ge oe He aut 5 Be Sh" □□ ya eH oe ae cn TS : t= oe ee. Sa ee Set Me : 7 = i, Fors 3 nie “a: E te me eet ar ne ‘ 65" ae nN 4 cet et . a 4 Bee eS : pee. . x, 5 ae alt Teg ee dee St ay, ES et % - □ ee rs ny > a aa hy = we ST ae oe co =. we □□ me edt Ping prac yi ee Ee we 7 ee = : Ge AGNES □□□ 4 □□ is nf □ □□ Se i 7p =u = =, atte! pe E ‘ “=? □□□ . “ * oe 7 = 2S □□ 2 siethe Ao ropes == = eres = Tes □ □ 5 as) yee TPR Fae eae Soh oof 4 a Se me =e : = ie Ha Sees oy on Se - AP pies” stinks : 7 rift | gubanuer. gs ee cipiapat! cs id.- i 4 □□ □□ Ear . Ser Bog a nn Saas os 7 < = or : □ 7 got e's on = ac ite as eo oe aye ; : □ 7 ae ao aon west ‘ ise Sos as eS “ . mse ~~ sets athe, OF the ~ Be hi = ‘ < = □□ = > □□ iy ghee RRS a eat i + i,” 743 - SP a Sa ew eng Be. ee eee OE Se Tt =r tet ‘ cae EM Te rise * ate Ris = soe - = a aay ip eels oe Ea ee 4 Pi ee = “te os □ □□ mie ort 2. eee a =" ta 3 □□ = mo gr Ee acct ere eS ae eee hana Goeernnrta! PO et Menace = +. xe Vi □ ‘ yttaege ta a ef ee | a AS es aE key 4 . pels 2 i See yh meet ry ie are 7 a 5 - 2 oe Sica seg eg ar □□ tent ‘ 2 □ □ ote aN I Sao wee a ee □ rr, = ' ae eh J agli f= Sh) See ae fe pe * “i - - □ □□□ = gl ee □ = i 7 . “cyl ages Se Se ENS 4 » oR ee i Stes wr = ste) □□□ 7 3 Eo Ses roe Bae ree ce □□ 7 75 Patel hitepete ns *, Sen ee yy “x : 1 ‘J = > ctf ~ 8 Bes 5 =) eae ett py) | em: Hay be ite. ae met et he “ot obigies pete PR eae fo cert perenats ei 4 2 RES id ae SEE SS ae wy ae AY og V4 eats POEL ES RSS BT Splatt Bee Ae gs er □□□ 1: fecia Oe Meee Se me ets Testers Stee St m4 Farry □□ They vine aeghe Boies Base Ato. ES ate ae? ites jeep Beri al hls ged gs □ bos TER ae EE ee EE ae □□ se he ove saul Se at ieee shy cele a ca =e £ + ES gee ot eee ee □ □ ais Sauber eae ht. a | area) 22S pea Ria sg Hs LA ee LT, Ae ot Popeater blamed Sees are Ta5. “aC Po eee PT ee pe ate ‘Sheu are eee eaten lt ee = eres? me; a mt Say Sie, □□□ =i oe sf = 1S _« a = a5 eo, eS tag, oS sean Hae ‘eke . ‘ 2 a ra a awe ae, = 2 : ee ah Ba eats Pose aye 23, Ta. : □□□ airs at ATA rests oe . - 7 ~ □□ ‘ . = ae sate = Pae=4 > = : ex Tire . a □□ Siig Ban. .* a