Bender v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bender v. Thompson

11 S.E.2d 667, 191 Ga. 91, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 615

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 12, 1940

Docket13302.

StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.E.2d 667 (Bender v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bender v. Thompson, 11 S.E.2d 667, 191 Ga. 91, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 615 (Ga. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

In a, suit for equitable foreclosure of a contractor’s lien on realty, involving appointment of a receiver, the judge refused at the trial the defendant’s request for submission to the jury of stated questions of fact on which to base a special verdict. A verdict for the plaintiff was returned. The defendant made a motion for a new trial. While the motion was pending the defendant came by direct *92 bill of exceptions in -which the only assignment of error was on the refusal to submit the questions of fact on which to base a special verdict. Held, that the exception was not to a final judgment, or to a judgment that would have been final as to the plaintiff in error if it had been rendered as he contended it should have been. On motion the writ of error is dismissed. Code, § 6-701;, Frankel v. Miami Butterine Co., 185 Ga. 284 (194 S. E. 503) ; Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 188 Ga. 138 (2 S. E. 2d, 916).

No. 13302. November 12, 1940. William F. Buchanan, lor plaintiff in error. Augustme Bams, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

In a, suit for equitable foreclosure of a contractor’s lien on realty, involving appointment of a receiver, the judge refused at the trial the defendant’s request for submission to the jury of stated questions of fact on which to base a special verdict. A verdict for the plaintiff was returned. The defendant made a motion for a new trial. While the motion was pending the defendant came by direct *92 bill of exceptions in -which the only assignment of error was on the refusal to submit the questions of fact on which to base a special verdict. Held, that the exception was not to a final judgment, or to a judgment that would have been final as to the plaintiff in error if it had been rendered as he contended it should have been. On motion the writ of error is dismissed. Code, § 6-701;, Frankel v. Miami Butterine Co., 185 Ga. 284 (194 S. E. 503) ; Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 188 Ga. 138 (2 S. E. 2d, 916).

No. 13302. November 12, 1940. William F. Buchanan, lor plaintiff in error. Augustme Bams, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 S.E.2d 667, 191 Ga. 91, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-v-thompson-ga-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack