Bender v. Streabich

37 A. 853, 182 Pa. 251, 40 W.N.C. 489, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 801
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 15, 1897
DocketAppeal, No. 899
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 37 A. 853 (Bender v. Streabich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bender v. Streabich, 37 A. 853, 182 Pa. 251, 40 W.N.C. 489, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 801 (Pa. 1897).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

The bill in this case was filed to restrain the defendants, who are the members of a board of school directors, from permitting the use of the schoolhouses under their charge for sectarian religious meetings, and for the holding of public lyceums. The only question presented is whether school directors may permit or authorize the use of school buildings for other than school purposes. This question, in so far as it relates to their use for’ [253]*253religious meetings, is fully answered by tbe decision in Hysong v. School District of Grallitzin Borough, 164 Pa. 629. The use of school buildings by the community at large for public meetings for the discussion of subjects of general interest may be said to be in the line of their use for educational purposes, but it is not the use intended by law. The public school system is for the instruction of pupils who may attend the schools, and not for the instruction or entertainment of other persons. The school directors are trustees of the.school property for that use, and they may not against objection authorize or permit its use for other purposes. If the school buildings may be used for meetings for the convenience, pleasure or instruction of the general public, all other school property may with equal propriety be so used, and it would be but a step further to apply a part of the school funds to the same use. This view of the law does not forbid the use of the buildings for any purpose directly related to the instruction of the pupils of the schools, and it does not exclude their use for lectures or debates which are made a part of the course of instruction.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Springfield Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF. ED.
397 A.2d 1154 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Springfield School District v. Department of Education
397 A.2d 1154 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
(1974)
63 Op. Att'y Gen. 374 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1974)
Wiest v. Mt. Lebanon School District
320 A.2d 362 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Use of State College Facilities for Religious Activities
60 Pa. D. & C.2d 306 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1973)
Regan v. Stoddard
65 A.2d 240 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Religious Education
64 Pa. D. & C. 549 (Pennsylvania Department of Justice, 1948)
Wilson v. Philadelphia School District
195 A. 90 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Ristine v. School District
26 Pa. D. & C. 655 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Beard v. Board of Education of North Summit School Dist.
16 P.2d 900 (Utah Supreme Court, 1932)
Merryman v. School District No. 16
5 P.2d 267 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A. 853, 182 Pa. 251, 40 W.N.C. 489, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-v-streabich-pa-1897.