Bender v. State

761 S.W.2d 378, 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 259, 1988 WL 129571
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 7, 1988·No. No. 1305-87·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of unlawful possession, with intent to deliver, a controlled substance. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at 10 years probation. On appeal the Houston [14th] Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Bender v. State, 739 S.W.2d 409 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1987).

Appellant raises two grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

ONION, P.J., and TEAGUE, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bender v. State, 761 S.W.2d 378, 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 259, 1988 WL 129571 (Tex. 1988).

761 S.W.2d 378 (Bender v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campos, Gregg Oscar v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004
Sixta v. State
875 S.W.2d 17 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)