Bender v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Bender v. State

586 So. 2d 295, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1215, 1991 WL 180420

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 26, 1991

Docket2 Div. 628

StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 295 (Bender v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bender v. State, 586 So. 2d 295, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1215, 1991 WL 180420 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

The trial court has returned an order to this court after having conducted a hearing concerning the mental examination of the appellant prior to his entry of a guilty plea. The trial court concluded that the appellant entered a voluntary guilty plea prior to being sentenced, imprisoned, and subsequently released, having completed the prison sentence. Specifically, the trial court found that the appellant was examined by an employee of the Cahaba Mental Health Center while the appellant was incarcerated in the Dallas County jail. The employee filed a report, finding the appellant competent to stand trial. The appellant contends that this employee is incompetent to render such an opinion; however, [296]*296the director of the Cahaba Mental Health Center testified that the employee is a competent mental health specialist and is competent to render judgments concerning mental examinations.

Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the trial court properly found that the appellant entered a voluntary guilty plea, and it properly denied the appellant’s petition.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

The trial court has returned an order to this court after having conducted a hearing concerning the mental examination of the appellant prior to his entry of a guilty plea. The trial court concluded that the appellant entered a voluntary guilty plea prior to being sentenced, imprisoned, and subsequently released, having completed the prison sentence. Specifically, the trial court found that the appellant was examined by an employee of the Cahaba Mental Health Center while the appellant was incarcerated in the Dallas County jail. The employee filed a report, finding the appellant competent to stand trial. The appellant contends that this employee is incompetent to render such an opinion; however, [296]*296the director of the Cahaba Mental Health Center testified that the employee is a competent mental health specialist and is competent to render judgments concerning mental examinations.

Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the trial court properly found that the appellant entered a voluntary guilty plea, and it properly denied the appellant’s petition.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 295, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1215, 1991 WL 180420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-v-state-alacrimapp-1991.