Bender v. Madison Square Garden Corp.
247 A.D.2d 344, 669 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1834
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1998·Published
Opinion
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered January 15, 1997, which deemed defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment to be one for reargument, and, so considered, denied the motion as untimely, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.
The IAS Court properly deemed defendants’ second motion for summary judgment as one for reargument, and accordingly we dismiss the appeal from the order denying it (see, Avildsen v Prystay, 243 AD2d 352).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bender v. Madison Square Garden Corp., 247 A.D.2d 344, 669 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
247 A.D.2d 344 (Bender v. Madison Square Garden Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Avildsen v. Prystay
243 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)