Bender v. Madison Square Garden Corp.

247 A.D.2d 344, 669 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1834

This text of 247 A.D.2d 344 (Bender v. Madison Square Garden Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bender v. Madison Square Garden Corp., 247 A.D.2d 344, 669 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered January 15, 1997, which deemed defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment to be one for reargument, and, so considered, denied the motion as untimely, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The IAS Court properly deemed defendants’ second motion for summary judgment as one for reargument, and accordingly we dismiss the appeal from the order denying it (see, Avildsen v Prystay, 243 AD2d 352).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Avildsen v. Prystay
243 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 344, 669 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-v-madison-square-garden-corp-nyappdiv-1998.