Bender v. Evans

81 F. App'x 799
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2003·No. No. 03-1885·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward H. Bender seeks to appeal the denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. [800] § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.CivP. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bender seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bender v. Evans, 81 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2003).

81 F. App'x 799 (Bender v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)