Bender v. Bridge & Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Bender v. Bridge & Co.

18 Ark. 291

DecidedJanuary 15, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ark. 291 (Bender v. Bridge & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bender v. Bridge & Co., 18 Ark. 291 (Ark. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This cause was brought here by writ of error to the Pulaski Circuit Court, sued out by Bender. The facts of the case, in all that is material to the point of law involved, are the same, as in the case of the Cincinnati and Little Rock Slate Co. vs. Bridge & Co., (17 Ark. R. p. ) following the cases of Thorn & Robins vs. Woodruff et al., 5 Ark. R. 55, and Moreland et al. vs. Pelham, 2 Eng. R. 338.

Upon the authority of these cases, the judgment in question must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This cause was brought here by writ of error to the Pulaski Circuit Court, sued out by Bender. The facts of the case, in all that is material to the point of law involved, are the same, as in the case of the Cincinnati and Little Rock Slate Co. vs. Bridge & Co., (17 Ark. R. p. ) following the cases of Thorn & Robins vs. Woodruff et al., 5 Ark. R. 55, and Moreland et al. vs. Pelham, 2 Eng. R. 338.

Upon the authority of these cases, the judgment in question must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ark. 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-v-bridge-co-ark-1857.