Bender v. Bender
763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 914, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 448
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 5, 2000
DocketSC 16434
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 763 A.2d 1037 (Bender v. Bender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bender v. Bender, 763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 914, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 448 (Colo. 2000).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 252 (AC 18968), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s award of the defendant’s nonvested pension benefit was not impermissibly speculative?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bender v. Bender
785 A.2d 197 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
763 A.2d 1037, 255 Conn. 914, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-v-bender-conn-2000.