Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens

379 So. 2d 594, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4304
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 11, 1980
Docket78-359
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 379 So. 2d 594 (Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bender Ship Repair, Inc. v. Stevens, 379 So. 2d 594, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4304 (Ala. 1980).

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

The original opinion in this case is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order permitted by this Court pursuant to Rule 5, ARAP. The circuit court order denying Bender's motion for judgment on the pleadings is reversed.

While employed by Bender under an employment contract terminable at will by either employer or employee, Stevens served on the Mobile County Grand Jury May 8, 9, 10 and 12. On May 11, during a break of jury service, Stevens contends by affidavit that he was fired, for service on the grand jury. Bender's evidence affidavits reflect that it terminated Stevens' employment on May 31, because he did not report to work after grand jury service.

Stevens sued Bender, alleging breach of employment contract by firing him for serving on the grand jury. Bender's motions to dismiss, for summary judgment, and for judgment on the pleadings were denied. The trial court certified the appealability of the denial of the motion for judgment on the pleadings. This Court granted permission to appeal.

Even though there is a conflict in the reason for termination, the crux of the case is whether an employer may terminate the employment under a terminable at will contract for any reason.

Under the decisions of this Court, an employment contract terminable at the will of either the employer or the employee, may be terminated by either of them with or without cause or justification. Hinrichs v. Tranquilaire Hospital,352 So.2d 1130 (Ala. 1977); Martin v. Tapley, 360 So.2d 708 (Ala. 1978). The provisions of Code 1975, § 12-16-8, protecting an employee from loss of his usual compensation while serving on a grand jury, do not alter this rule.

REVERSED AND REMANDED, OPINION SUBSTITUTED FOR ORIGINAL OPINION, AND APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

TORBERT, C.J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hexcel Decatur, Inc. v. Vickers
908 So. 2d 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005)
Scott Bridge Co. v. Wright
883 So. 2d 1221 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Johnson
740 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)
Carl v. Children's Hospital
702 A.2d 159 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)
Howard v. WOLFE BROADCASTING CORP.
611 So. 2d 307 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1992)
McClain v. Birmingham Coca-Cola Bottling
578 So. 2d 1299 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
Salter v. Alfa Ins. Co., Inc.
561 So. 2d 1050 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1990)
Bosarge v. Bankers Life Co.
541 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. Campbell
512 So. 2d 725 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)
Jones v. Ethridge
497 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)
Rice v. United Ins. Co. of America
465 So. 2d 1100 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Meeks v. OPP Cotton Mills, Inc.
459 So. 2d 814 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Johnson v. Gary
443 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
McKinney v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
449 So. 2d 794 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Kitsos v. Mobile Gas Service Corporation
431 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Meredith v. C.E. Walther, Inc.
422 So. 2d 761 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
Bates v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.
418 So. 2d 903 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
Maus v. National Living Centers, Inc.
633 S.W.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Adler v. American Standard Corp.
432 A.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 So. 2d 594, 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-ship-repair-inc-v-stevens-ala-1980.