BENDER, JENSON & SILVERSTEIN, LLP v. Walter
926 N.E.2d 255, 14 N.Y.3d 811, 899 N.Y.S.2d 751, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 353
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 1, 2010
DocketMo. No. 2010-108
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 926 N.E.2d 255 (BENDER, JENSON & SILVERSTEIN, LLP v. Walter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
BENDER, JENSON & SILVERSTEIN, LLP v. Walter, 926 N.E.2d 255, 14 N.Y.3d 811, 899 N.Y.S.2d 751, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 353 (N.Y. 2010).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief etc. dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Freedman v. Horike
926 N.E.2d 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
926 N.E.2d 255, 14 N.Y.3d 811, 899 N.Y.S.2d 751, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bender-jenson-silverstein-llp-v-walter-ny-2010.