Bender, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phl. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 18, 2015·No. 88 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JOHNUALL BENDER, : No. 88 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (providing that hybrid

representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings

to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bender, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phl. Co., (Pa. 2015).

Bender, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phl. Co. (Bender, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phl. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)